"Employee turnover and job performance: monitoring the influences of salary growth and promotion". How do the source's conclusions bear on your own research or thought process? Value and significance of the work as a contribution to the subject under considerationĭoes this source further your understanding of the topic?Īny significant special features of the work?ĭoes the work have a particularly good glossary, appendices, charts, or good index? Who is the author writing for? Is the work geared for specialists or other researchers or for a general audience? Is this source too basic, too technical, too advanced, or did you find the information "just right" for your needs? Make note of any errors or omissions that you detect.Īuthor's intellectual/academic credentialsĪre the author(s) credentials related to the subject matter of the article? Are the author(s) associated with credible organizations? Theoretical basis and currency of the author's argumentĭoes the information appear to be valid and well-researched (supported by data), or is it questionable or wildly out of line with what other researchers are reporting and unsupported by evidence? The more radically an author departs from the views of others in the same field, the more carefully and critically you should scrutinize their ideas. Is the publication organized logically? Were you able to determine the main thesis of the work? Are the main and supporting points clearly presented and not in a repetitive or circular fashion? Do you find the text easy to read, or is it awkward, stilted or choppy? Look over the table of contents and the index to get an overview of the materials and concepts that it covers.īrief description of the work's format and content If your source is a book, try reading the preface to determine the author's intention or purpose for the book. Consider the following when evaluating your source for your annotation:Įxplanation of the main purpose and scope of the cited work In addition to evaluating the source (See: Evaluating Sources), you will want to analyze the content of the article as well. Check the requirements of your assignment, as specifications for annotated bibliographies will differ. Annotated bibliographies may be descriptive (like an abstract), but are more often critical, analytical, or evaluative. Abstracts are descriptive summaries or overviews found at the beginning of scholarly journal articles or in an article database. alphabetical by author for APA and MLA).Ībstracts differ from annotations. Your sources will be listed in the same order they would be in a reference list (ex. APA, MLA), but a short annotation will follow each citation. Your citations should be formatted using the conventions of your chosen style (ex. Think of an annotated bibliography as an extended reference or Works Cited list. books, journal articles, etc.) that includes a brief explanation or note accompanying each source describing the scope or content and critical analysis of a particular work. An annotated bibliography is a list of sources (i.e.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |